Tests edge cases, boundary conditions, and common misconceptions for trigonometry.
UT-1: Solving Trigonometric Equations — Missing Solutions from Periodicity
Question:
Solve sin2x=cosx for x∈[0,2π].
A student writes: "sin2x=cosx⟹2sinxcosx=cosx⟹cosx(2sinx−1)=0. So cosx=0 or sinx=21."
(a) Complete the student's working and verify that all solutions are found.
(b) Another student cancels cosx from both sides at the start, writing sin2x=cosx⟹2sinx=1. Explain what is lost.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the common error of dividing by a factor that could be zero, and ensuring all solutions are found.]
Solution:
(a) From cosx(2sinx−1)=0:
Case 1: cosx=0 in [0,2π]: x=2π,23π.
Case 2: 2sinx−1=0⟹sinx=21 in [0,2π]: x=6π,65π.
All four solutions: x=6π,2π,65π,23π.
(b) By cancelling cosx, the student loses all solutions where cosx=0, namely x=2π and x=23π. The student would find only two solutions instead of four. Dividing by a quantity that can be zero is only valid if that quantity is confirmed to be non-zero.
(b) A student writes sin(2x)=2sin2x. Find the correct expression and identify the error.
(c) Find the exact value of cos4(8π).
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the common confusion between sin(2x) and sin2x, and applies double angle identities.]
Solution:
(a) Using cos2x=1−2sin2x:
2sin2x=1−cos2x⟹sin2x=21−cos2x
(b) The correct expression is sin(2x)=2sinxcosx, not 2sin2x. The student confused the double angle formula for sine with sin2x. These are fundamentally different: sin(2x) is the sine of double the angle, while sin2x is the square of the sine.
(b) With u=sinx, du=cosxdx, when x=0: u=0, when x=2π: u=1:
∫0π/2sin2xcos2xdx=∫01u2(1−u2)du=∫01(u2−u4)du
=[3u3−5u5]01=31−51=152
Note: this does NOT equal 16π. The student's substitution du=cosxdx loses the sign information when cosx changes sign. The substitution u=sinx is only valid on intervals where cosx≥0, which [0,2π] satisfies. However, the student substituted cos2x=1−u2 but the differential gives du=cosxdx, not du=∣cosx∣dx. Since cosx≥0 on [0,2π], this substitution is actually valid, but the computation 152=16π reveals an error: the identity sin2xcos2x=u2(1−u2) is correct, but ∫0π/2sin2xcos2xdx via u-substitution should use du=cosxdx, giving ∫01u2cosxdx, not ∫01u2du. The student incorrectly replaced cosxdx with du while also replacing cos2x with 1−u2. This is only correct if we use du=cosxdx, but then we can't also replace the remaining cosx with 1−u2 unless we are careful about signs.
The correct u-substitution: du=cosxdx, so:
∫0π/2sin2xcos2xdx=∫01u2cosxdu
But cosx=1−u2 on this interval, so:
=∫01u21−u2du
This is an elliptic integral and does not have an elementary closed form. The correct answer 16π comes from the double-angle identity approach, not from this substitution. The student's error was applying two substitutions simultaneously without accounting for both cosx factors.