Tests edge cases, boundary conditions, and common misconceptions for differential equations.
UT-1: Separable Equations — Lost Equilibrium Solutions
Question:
(a) Solve dxdy=y2−1 with the general solution.
(b) A student separates variables and writes y2−1dy=dx, integrates, and arrives at the general solution 21lny+1y−1=x+C. They claim this covers all solutions. Is this correct?
(c) Find the particular solution with y(0)=1.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the common error of losing equilibrium solutions when dividing by g(y).]
Solution:
(a) First check equilibrium solutions: y2−1=0⟹y=1 or y=−1.
For y=±1, separate variables using partial fractions:
y2−11=(y−1)(y+1)1=2(y−1)1−2(y+1)1
∫y2−11dy=∫dx
21lny+1y−1=x+C
y+1y−1=e2(x+C)=Ae2x
where A=e2C>0. Including the equilibrium solutions, the general solution is:
y=1,y=−1,ory+1y−1=±Ae2x
(b) The student's solution is incomplete because they lost the equilibrium solutions y=1 and y=−1. By dividing by y2−1, the student implicitly assumed y2−1=0. The equilibrium solutions must be stated separately and are not captured by the formula 21lny+1y−1=x+C.
(c) The particular solution with y(0)=1 is simply the equilibrium solution y=1 for all x. This can be verified: dxdy=0 and y2−1=1−1=0. Confirmed.
Note that if the student tries to use their formula: 21ln20=0+C⟹21ln0, which is undefined. This shows the equilibrium solution y=1 cannot be obtained from the separated formula.
(a) Find the general solution using an integrating factor.
(b) A student rewrites the equation as dxdy−2y=e3x, computes the integrating factor as μ=e−2x, and gets the wrong answer. Identify the error in their working:
Their working: dxd(ye−2x)=e3x⋅e−2x=ex.
So ye−2x=ex+C⟹y=e3x+Ce2x.
With y(0)=1: 1=1+C⟹C=0, so y=e3x.
Verify: dxdy=3e3x and 2y+e3x=2e3x+e3x=3e3x. Confirmed.
(c) Was the student actually wrong? If not, explain why.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the integrating factor method and careful verification of solutions.]
Solution:
(a) Rewrite in standard form: dxdy−2y=e3x.
Integrating factor: μ=e∫−2dx=e−2x.
Multiply through: e−2xdxdy−2e−2xy=e3x⋅e−2x=ex.
The left side is dxd(ye−2x):
dxd(ye−2x)=ex
ye−2x=ex+C
y=e3x+Ce2x
With y(0)=1: 1=1+C⟹C=0.
Particular solution: y=e3x.
(b) The student's working is actually correct. Despite the framing of the question, the student:
Correctly identified the standard form.
Correctly computed the integrating factor μ=e−2x.
Correctly applied the method.
Correctly found the particular solution.
Correctly verified it.
(c) The student was not wrong. This question is designed to test whether the student can recognise that a seemingly suspicious answer is actually correct when verified. The key lesson is to always verify solutions by substitution, rather than relying on intuition about whether an answer "looks right."
(b) A student writes the general solution as y=Ae−2x+Be−2x=(A+B)e−2x=Ce−2x and then uses the initial conditions to find C=1. Explain why this is wrong.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests the repeated root case of the characteristic equation.]
Solution:
(a) Characteristic equation: λ2+4λ+4=0⟹(λ+2)2=0.
Repeated root: λ=−2 (algebraic multiplicity 2).
The general solution for a repeated root is:
y=(A+Bx)e−2x
Note the factor of x in the second term. This is essential.
(b) The student's error is treating the repeated root λ=−2 as two independent solutions e−2x and e−2x. These are the same function, so they are linearly dependent. The general solution requires two linearly independent solutions.
For a repeated root λ, the two independent solutions are eλx and xeλx. The factor of x is derived from the method of reduction of order or from the Taylor expansion perspective: when the characteristic equation has a repeated root, the second solution involves the derivative of eλx with respect to λ.
Using the correct general solution with y(0)=1 and y′(0)=0: