Skip to content

Thermodynamics -- Diagnostic Tests

Heat is like a river of energy flowing from hot to cold, thermodynamics is the study of how this energy flows and transforms: The second law of thermodynamics introduces entropy, the universe tends toward disorder, setting the arrow of time and limiting what engines can achieve

Why it matters: Thermodynamics governs everything from car engines to refrigerators to the ultimate fate of the universe

The key insight: The second law of thermodynamics introduces entropy, the universe tends toward disorder, setting the arrow of time and limiting what engines can achieve

Question:

(a) Calculate the volume occupied by 2.0 mol2.0\,\text{mol} of an ideal gas at T=300 KT = 300\,\text{K} and P=100 atmP = 100\,\text{atm}. Compare this with the actual volume using the van der Waals equation with a=0.137 Pa m6 mol−2a = 0.137\,\text{Pa}\,\text{m}^6\,\text{mol}^{-2} and b=3.87×10−5 m3 mol−1b = 3.87 \times 10^{-5}\,\text{m}^3\,\text{mol}^{-1} (values for nitrogen).

(b) Explain under what conditions a real gas behaves most like an ideal gas and why.

(c) A student claims that “at very low temperatures, the ideal gas law still applies because it is a fundamental law of nature.” Refute this claim.

Solution:

(a) Ideal gas:

PV=nRT⇒V=nRTP=2.0×8.314×300100×1.013×105PV = nRT \Rightarrow V = \frac{nRT}{P} = \frac{2.0 \times 8.314 \times 300}{100 \times 1.013 \times 10^5} V=4988.41.013×107=4.92×10−4 m3=0.492 LV = \frac{4988.4}{1.013 \times 10^7} = 4.92 \times 10^{-4}\,\text{m}^3 = 0.492\,\text{L}

Van der Waals equation: (P+an2V2)(V−nb)=nRT\left(P + \frac{an^2}{V^2}\right)(V - nb) = nRT

This must be solved numerically. Substituting P = 1.013 \times 10^7\,\text{Pa}$$n = 2.0$$T = 300\,\text{K}:

(1.013×107+0.137×4.0V2)(V−7.74×10−5)=4988.4\left(1.013 \times 10^7 + \frac{0.137 \times 4.0}{V^2}\right)(V - 7.74 \times 10^{-5}) = 4988.4

By iterative solution, V≈4.60×10−4 m3=0.460 LV \approx 4.60 \times 10^{-4}\,\text{m}^3 = 0.460\,\text{L}.

The ideal gas overestimates the volume by about 7%7\% at 100 atm100\,\text{atm}. The discrepancy arises because at high pressure, the volume of the molecules themselves (nbnb term) is not negligible compared to the total volume, and the intermolecular attractions (an2/V2an^2/V^2 term) reduce the effective pressure.

(b) A real gas behaves most like an ideal gas when:

  • Low pressure: molecules are far apart, so intermolecular forces are negligible and molecular volume is insignificant
  • High temperature: molecules have high kinetic energy, so intermolecular potential energy is negligible compared to kinetic energy

The ideal gas model assumes: (1) molecules are point masses with zero volume, (2) no intermolecular forces except during elastic collisions.

(c) The ideal gas law is not a fundamental law of nature — it is a model that works well under specific conditions (low pressure, high temperature). At very low temperatures:

  • Gases liquefy and solidify, which the ideal gas law cannot predict
  • Intermolecular forces become dominant
  • The gas may no longer exist as a gas phase

The ideal gas law is an approximation valid when intermolecular forces and molecular volume are negligible.


Question:

A gas undergoes three processes:

Process A: The gas expands from V1=2.0×10−3 m3V_1 = 2.0 \times 10^{-3}\,\text{m}^3 to V2=5.0×10−3 m3V_2 = 5.0 \times 10^{-3}\,\text{m}^3 at constant pressure P=2.0×105 PaP = 2.0 \times 10^5\,\text{Pa}. During this process, 400 J400\,\text{J} of heat is supplied to the gas.

Process B: The gas is compressed isothermally from V2V_2 back to V1V_1.

Process C: The gas is heated at constant volume from V1V_1 back to its original state.

(a) For process A, calculate the work done by the gas and the change in internal energy.

(b) For process B, calculate the work done on the gas and the heat exchanged.

(c) Calculate the net work done and net heat exchanged over the complete cycle A-B-C.

Solution:

(a) Process A (isobaric expansion):

Work done by the gas: W=PΔV=2.0×105×(5.0−2.0)×10−3=2.0×105×3.0×10−3=600 JW = P\Delta V = 2.0 \times 10^5 \times (5.0 - 2.0) \times 10^{-3} = 2.0 \times 10^5 \times 3.0 \times 10^{-3} = 600\,\text{J}

First law: ΔU=Q−W\Delta U = Q - W (using the convention where WW is work done by the gas)

ΔU=400−600=−200 J\Delta U = 400 - 600 = -200\,\text{J}

The internal energy decreases by 200 J200\,\text{J} even though heat is added. This is counterintuitive: the gas does more work than the heat supplied, so it must draw on its internal energy.

(b) Process B (isothermal compression):

For an isothermal process, ΔU=0\Delta U = 0 (ideal gas, TT constant).

Q=WQ = W (all heat input equals work output, or vice versa)

Work done on the gas (compression):

Won=nRTln⁡V2V1=P2V2ln⁡V2V1W_{\text{on}} = nRT\ln\frac{V_2}{V_1} = P_2V_2\ln\frac{V_2}{V_1}

We need P2P_2 at the start of process B. From process A, the final state has V2=5.0×10−3 m3V_2 = 5.0 \times 10^{-3}\,\text{m}^3 and P=2.0×105 PaP = 2.0 \times 10^5\,\text{Pa}. We need the temperature:

T=PV/(nR)T = PV/(nR). From the ideal gas law, nR=P1V1/T1nR = P_1V_1/T_1. But we need to know the initial temperature.

Alternatively, for an ideal gas with ΔU=−200 J\Delta U = -200\,\text{J} and ΔT\Delta T corresponding:

ΔU=nCvΔT=−200 J\Delta U = nC_v\Delta T = -200\,\text{J}

We don”t have enough information for a numerical answer without nn or CvC_v. Let’s use PV=nRTPV = nRT at the start of process B:

TB=PBVB/(nR)=2.0×105×5.0×10−3/(nR)T_B = P_B V_B/(nR) = 2.0 \times 10^5 \times 5.0 \times 10^{-3}/(nR)

The work done on the gas during isothermal compression:

Won=nRTBln⁡(V2/V1)=PBVBln⁡(5.0/2.0)=2.0×105×5.0×10−3×ln⁡(2.5)W_{\text{on}} = nRT_B\ln(V_2/V_1) = P_BV_B\ln(5.0/2.0) = 2.0 \times 10^5 \times 5.0 \times 10^{-3} \times \ln(2.5) =1000×0.916=916 J= 1000 \times 0.916 = 916\,\text{J}

Since ΔU=0\Delta U = 0: Q=W=916 JQ = W = 916\,\text{J} of heat must be removed from the gas (negative QQ in the first law convention).

(c) Process C (isochoric heating):

W=0W = 0 (no volume change)

ΔU=Q\Delta U = Q (all heat goes to internal energy)

For the complete cycle: ΔUtotal=0\Delta U_{\text{total}} = 0 (internal energy is a state function).

Qnet=WnetQ_{\text{net}} = W_{\text{net}}

Qnet=400+(−916)+QCQ_{\text{net}} = 400 + (-916) + Q_C

Wnet=600+(−916)+0=−316 JW_{\text{net}} = 600 + (-916) + 0 = -316\,\text{J}

So QC=Wnet−400+916=−316+516=200 JQ_C = W_{\text{net}} - 400 + 916 = -316 + 516 = 200\,\text{J}

Check: Qnet=400−916+200=−316 J=WnetQ_{\text{net}} = 400 - 916 + 200 = -316\,\text{J} = W_{\text{net}}. Confirmed.


Question:

A Carnot engine operates between a hot reservoir at TH=600 KT_H = 600\,\text{K} and a cold reservoir at TC=300 KT_C = 300\,\text{K}. In each cycle, it absorbs QH=1200 JQ_H = 1200\,\text{J} from the hot reservoir.

(a) Calculate the efficiency, work output per cycle, and heat rejected to the cold reservoir.

(b) Calculate the entropy change of the universe per cycle.

(c) A student claims that a heat engine can be 100%100\% efficient if the cold reservoir is at absolute zero. Discuss whether this is theoretically possible and practically achievable.

Solution:

(a) Carnot efficiency: η=1−TC/TH=1−300/600=0.50=50%\eta = 1 - T_C/T_H = 1 - 300/600 = 0.50 = 50\%

Work per cycle: W=ηQH=0.50×1200=600 JW = \eta Q_H = 0.50 \times 1200 = 600\,\text{J}

Heat rejected: QC=QH−W=1200−600=600 JQ_C = Q_H - W = 1200 - 600 = 600\,\text{J}

(b) Entropy change of the hot reservoir: ΔSH=−QH/TH=−1200/600=−2.0 J K−1\Delta S_H = -Q_H/T_H = -1200/600 = -2.0\,\text{J}\,\text{K}^{-1}

Entropy change of the cold reservoir: ΔSC=QC/TC=600/300=+2.0 J K−1\Delta S_C = Q_C/T_C = 600/300 = +2.0\,\text{J}\,\text{K}^{-1}

Total entropy change of the universe: ΔSuniv=−2.0+2.0=0\Delta S_{\text{univ}} = -2.0 + 2.0 = 0

This is zero, as expected for a reversible (Carnot) cycle. A real engine would have ΔSuniv>0\Delta S_{\text{univ}} \gt 0.

(c) Theoretically, as TC→0T_C \to 0: η=1−TC/TH→1=100%\eta = 1 - T_C/T_H \to 1 = 100\%. The third law of thermodynamics states that absolute zero cannot be reached by any finite number of processes, so TC=0 KT_C = 0\,\text{K} is unattainable. Practically, even if it were approachable, no process can be perfectly reversible, so 100%100\% efficiency is impossible.

However, the theoretical limit of efficiency does approach 100%100\% as TC→0T_C \to 0 Which is why reaching very low temperatures requires increasingly sophisticated and energy-intensive cooling methods.

IT-1: Adiabatic Expansion with Work Calculation (with Energy)

Section titled “IT-1: Adiabatic Expansion with Work Calculation (with Energy)”

Question:

3.0 mol3.0\,\text{mol} of a monatomic ideal gas (γ=5/3\gamma = 5/3) initially at T1=400 KT_1 = 400\,\text{K} and P1=4.0×105 PaP_1 = 4.0 \times 10^5\,\text{Pa} expands adiabatically until its volume doubles.

(a) Calculate the final temperature and pressure.

(b) Calculate the work done by the gas.

(c) If the same gas were to expand isothermally from the same initial state to double its volume, calculate the work done and compare with part (b).

Solution:

(a) Initial volume: V1=nRT1/P1=3.0×8.314×400/(4.0×105)=9976.8/4.0×105=2.494×10−2 m3V_1 = nRT_1/P_1 = 3.0 \times 8.314 \times 400/(4.0 \times 10^5) = 9976.8/4.0 \times 10^5 = 2.494 \times 10^{-2}\,\text{m}^3

Final volume: V2=2V1=4.989×10−2 m3V_2 = 2V_1 = 4.989 \times 10^{-2}\,\text{m}^3

Adiabatic relation: T1V1γ−1=T2V2γ−1T_1V_1^{\gamma - 1} = T_2V_2^{\gamma - 1}

T2=T1(V1V2)γ−1=400×(12)2/3=400×0.6300=252 KT_2 = T_1\left(\frac{V_1}{V_2}\right)^{\gamma - 1} = 400 \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2/3} = 400 \times 0.6300 = 252\,\text{K}

Adiabatic relation: P1V1γ=P2V2γP_1V_1^\gamma = P_2V_2^\gamma

P2=P1(V1V2)γ=4.0×105×(12)5/3=4.0×105×0.3150=1.26×105 PaP_2 = P_1\left(\frac{V_1}{V_2}\right)^\gamma = 4.0 \times 10^5 \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{5/3} = 4.0 \times 10^5 \times 0.3150 = 1.26 \times 10^5\,\text{Pa}

(b) For an adiabatic process, Q=0Q = 0 So W=−ΔUW = -\Delta U:

ΔU=nCv(T2−T1)=3.0×32R×(252−400)\Delta U = nC_v(T_2 - T_1) = 3.0 \times \frac{3}{2}R \times (252 - 400) =3.0×12.471×(−148)=−5537 J= 3.0 \times 12.471 \times (-148) = -5537\,\text{J}

Work done by gas: W=−ΔU=5537 JW = -\Delta U = 5537\,\text{J}

(c) Isothermal expansion to double volume:

W=nRT1ln⁡V2V1=3.0×8.314×400×ln⁡2W = nRT_1\ln\frac{V_2}{V_1} = 3.0 \times 8.314 \times 400 \times \ln 2 =9976.8×0.6931=6915 J= 9976.8 \times 0.6931 = 6915\,\text{J}

The isothermal work (6915 J6915\,\text{J}) is greater than the adiabatic work (5537 J5537\,\text{J}). This is because in the adiabatic case, the gas cools as it expands, reducing the pressure and therefore the work output. In the isothermal case, heat flows in to maintain the temperature, keeping the pressure higher and allowing more work.


IT-2: Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis (with Energy)

Section titled “IT-2: Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis (with Energy)”

Question:

A gas undergoes a cycle consisting of three processes:

  • 1 to 2: Isobaric expansion at P=3.0×105 PaP = 3.0 \times 10^5\,\text{Pa}, VV increases from 1.0×10−3 m31.0 \times 10^{-3}\,\text{m}^3 to 3.0×10−3 m33.0 \times 10^{-3}\,\text{m}^3
  • 2 to 3: Isochoric cooling, PP decreases to 1.0×105 Pa1.0 \times 10^5\,\text{Pa}
  • 3 to 1: Isothermal compression back to state 1

(a) Calculate the work done, heat exchanged, and change in internal energy for each process.

(b) Calculate the efficiency of the cycle.

(c) Calculate the maximum possible efficiency for an engine operating between the maximum and minimum temperatures of this cycle.

Solution:

(a) Process 1 to 2 (isobaric expansion):

W12=PΔV=3.0×105×(3.0−1.0)×10−3=600 JW_{12} = P\Delta V = 3.0 \times 10^5 \times (3.0 - 1.0) \times 10^{-3} = 600\,\text{J}

Temperature at state 1: T1=P1V1/(nR)=3.0×105×1.0×10−3/(nR)=300/(nR)T_1 = P_1V_1/(nR) = 3.0 \times 10^5 \times 1.0 \times 10^{-3}/(nR) = 300/(nR)

Temperature at state 2: T2=P2V2/(nR)=3.0×105×3.0×10−3/(nR)=900/(nR)T_2 = P_2V_2/(nR) = 3.0 \times 10^5 \times 3.0 \times 10^{-3}/(nR) = 900/(nR)

Since T2=3T1T_2 = 3T_1 And ΔU=nCv(T2−T1)\Delta U = nC_v(T_2 - T_1):

Without knowing nn or the gas type, let nR=300/T1nR = 300/T_1 So nR=300/T1nR = 300/T_1. Let T1T_1 be the reference. We can work in ratios.

ΔU12=nCv(T2−T1)=nCv×2T1\Delta U_{12} = nC_v(T_2 - T_1) = nC_v \times 2T_1

Q12=nCp(T2−T1)=nCp×2T1Q_{12} = nC_p(T_2 - T_1) = nC_p \times 2T_1

For a monatomic ideal gas: Cv=3R/2C_v = 3R/2, Cp=5R/2C_p = 5R/2.

nR=P1V1/T1=300/T1nR = P_1V_1/T_1 = 300/T_1 So n=300/(RT1)n = 300/(RT_1).

Let us use specific values. Let T1=100 KT_1 = 100\,\text{K} (choosing for convenience, the ratios will be the same).

Then nR=3.0nR = 3.0, n=3.0/8.314=0.361 moln = 3.0/8.314 = 0.361\,\text{mol}.

T2=300 KT_2 = 300\,\text{K}, T3=P3V3/(nR)=1.0×105×3.0×10−3/3.0=100 K=T1T_3 = P_3V_3/(nR) = 1.0 \times 10^5 \times 3.0 \times 10^{-3}/3.0 = 100\,\text{K} = T_1.

ΔU12=0.361×1.5×8.314×(300−100)=0.361×12.471×200=900 J\Delta U_{12} = 0.361 \times 1.5 \times 8.314 \times (300 - 100) = 0.361 \times 12.471 \times 200 = 900\,\text{J}

Q12=W12+ΔU12=600+900=1500 JQ_{12} = W_{12} + \Delta U_{12} = 600 + 900 = 1500\,\text{J}

Process 2 to 3 (isochoric cooling):

W23=0W_{23} = 0

ΔU23=0.361×12.471×(100−300)=−900 J\Delta U_{23} = 0.361 \times 12.471 \times (100 - 300) = -900\,\text{J}

Q23=−900 JQ_{23} = -900\,\text{J}

Process 3 to 1 (isothermal compression):

ΔU31=0\Delta U_{31} = 0 (isothermal)

W31=nRT3ln⁡(V1/V3)=3.0×ln⁡(1/3)=3.0×(−1.099)=−3.30 JW_{31} = nRT_3\ln(V_1/V_3) = 3.0 \times \ln(1/3) = 3.0 \times (-1.099) = -3.30\,\text{J}

nRT3=P3V3=1.0×105×3.0×10−3=300 JnRT_3 = P_3V_3 = 1.0 \times 10^5 \times 3.0 \times 10^{-3} = 300\,\text{J}.

W31=300×ln⁡(1/3)=300×(−1.099)=−330 JW_{31} = 300 \times \ln(1/3) = 300 \times (-1.099) = -330\,\text{J}

Q31=W31=−330 JQ_{31} = W_{31} = -330\,\text{J}

(b) Net work: Wnet=600+0−330=270 JW_{\text{net}} = 600 + 0 - 330 = 270\,\text{J}

Heat input (positive QQ): Qin=1500 JQ_{\text{in}} = 1500\,\text{J}

Efficiency: η=Wnet/Qin=270/1500=0.18=18%\eta = W_{\text{net}}/Q_{\text{in}} = 270/1500 = 0.18 = 18\%

(c) Maximum temperature: Tmax⁡=T2=300 KT_{\max} = T_2 = 300\,\text{K}

Minimum temperature: Tmin⁡=T1=T3=100 KT_{\min} = T_1 = T_3 = 100\,\text{K}

Carnot efficiency: ηCarnot=1−Tmin⁡/Tmax⁡=1−100/300=2/3=67%\eta_{\text{Carnot}} = 1 - T_{\min}/T_{\max} = 1 - 100/300 = 2/3 = 67\%

The actual cycle efficiency (18%18\%) is much lower than the Carnot limit (67%67\%), as expected for a real cycle with irreversible processes.


IT-3: Gas Laws Combined with Kinetic Theory (with Dynamics)

Section titled “IT-3: Gas Laws Combined with Kinetic Theory (with Dynamics)”

Question:

A sealed container of volume V=0.010 m3V = 0.010\,\text{m}^3 contains n=0.40 moln = 0.40\,\text{mol} of an ideal monatomic gas at temperature T=350 KT = 350\,\text{K}.

(a) Calculate the pressure using the ideal gas law.

(b) Using kinetic theory, calculate the root-mean-square speed of the gas molecules and the average translational kinetic energy per molecule.

(c) The container is heated to T′=700 KT' = 700\,\text{K}. Calculate the new pressure and the change in the total internal energy. The mass of one gas molecule (argon) is m=6.63×10−26 kgm = 6.63 \times 10^{-26}\,\text{kg}.

Solution:

(a) P=nRT/V=0.40×8.314×350/0.010=1164 PaP = nRT/V = 0.40 \times 8.314 \times 350/0.010 = 1164\,\text{Pa}

(b) RMS speed: vrms=3RTMv_{\text{rms}} = \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}} where M=m×NA=6.63×10−26×6.022×1023=0.0399 kg mol−1M = m \times N_A = 6.63 \times 10^{-26} \times 6.022 \times 10^{23} = 0.0399\,\text{kg}\,\text{mol}^{-1}

vrms=3×8.314×3500.0399=8729.70.0399=218793=468 m s−1v_{\text{rms}} = \sqrt{\frac{3 \times 8.314 \times 350}{0.0399}} = \sqrt{\frac{8729.7}{0.0399}} = \sqrt{218793} = 468\,\text{m}\,\text{s}^{-1}

Average KE per molecule: ⟨Ek⟩=32kBT=32×1.381×10−23×350=7.25×10−21 J\langle E_k \rangle = \frac{3}{2}k_BT = \frac{3}{2} \times 1.381 \times 10^{-23} \times 350 = 7.25 \times 10^{-21}\,\text{J}

(c) New pressure: P′=nRT′/V=0.40×8.314×700/0.010=2328 PaP' = nRT'/V = 0.40 \times 8.314 \times 700/0.010 = 2328\,\text{Pa}

This is double the original pressure (since TT doubled at constant VV), confirming P∝TP \propto T at constant VV.

Change in internal energy: ΔU=nCvΔT=0.40×32×8.314×(700−350)\Delta U = nC_v\Delta T = 0.40 \times \frac{3}{2} \times 8.314 \times (700 - 350)

=0.40×12.471×350=1746 J= 0.40 \times 12.471 \times 350 = 1746\,\text{J}

New RMS speed: vrms′=3×8.314×7000.0399=437586=661 m s−1v_{\text{rms}}' = \sqrt{\frac{3 \times 8.314 \times 700}{0.0399}} = \sqrt{437586} = 661\,\text{m}\,\text{s}^{-1}

Ratio: vrms′/vrms=2≈1.414v_{\text{rms}}'/v_{\text{rms}} = \sqrt{2} \approx 1.414. Doubling the temperature increases the RMS speed by a factor of 2\sqrt{2}.