Vectors are like arrows — they have both direction and magnitude, unlike scalars which are just numbers: Vectors provide a coordinate-free way to describe physical quantities that have direction, making physics equations independent of the coordinate system chosen
Why it matters: From GPS navigation to computer animation to quantum mechanics, vectors are the language of directional quantities
The key insight: Vectors provide a coordinate-free way to describe physical quantities that have direction, making physics equations independent of the coordinate system chosen
(a) Determine whether L1 and L2 are parallel, intersecting, or skew.
(b) If skew, find the shortest distance between them.
(c) A student claims: “Since the direction vectors are not scalar multiples, the lines must intersect.” Explain why this reasoning is wrong.
[Difficulty: hard. Tests classification of lines in 3D and computation of shortest distance between skew lines.]
Solution:
(a) The direction vectors are d1=21−1 and d2=1−12.
These are not scalar multiples, so the lines are not parallel.
To check for intersection, set the position vectors equal:
1+2λ=3+μ⟹2λ−μ=2(i)
2+λ=1−μ⟹λ+μ=−1(ii)
0−λ=4+2μ⟹−λ−2μ=4(iii)
From (i) and (ii): adding gives 3λ=1 So λ=31 Then μ=−34.
Check (iii): −31−2(−34)=−31+38=37=4.
The system is inconsistent, so the lines do not intersect. They are skew.
(b) The shortest distance between skew lines is:
d=∣d1×d2∣∣(a2−a1)⋅(d1×d2)∣
a2−a1=314−120=2−14
d1×d2=i21j1−1k−12=1−5−3
∣d1×d2∣=1+25+9=35
(a2−a1)⋅(d1×d2)=2(1)+(−1)(−5)+4(−3)=2+5−12=−5
d=355=35535=735
(c) The student”s error is that in three dimensions, two lines that are not parallel can still fail to intersect. In 2D, non-parallel lines always intersect, but in 3D they can be skew — they pass at different “heights” and never meet. The student has incorrectly generalised the 2D result.
Four points are given: O(0, 0, 0)$$A(2, 1, 0)$$B(1, 3, 2) And C(0,1,4).
(a) Find the volume of tetrahedron OABC.
(b) Show that the four points are coplanar if and only if the scalar triple product [OA,OB,OC]=0.
[Difficulty: hard. Combines scalar triple product with geometric interpretation.]
Solution:
(a) The volume of a tetrahedron with vertices O$$A$$B$$C is:
V=61∣[OA,OB,OC]∣
OA=210,OB=132,OC=014
[OA,OB,OC]=OA⋅(OB×OC)
OB×OC=i10j31k24=10−41
[OA,OB,OC]=2(10)+1(−4)+0(1)=20−4=16
V=616=38
(b) The scalar triple product [a,b,c]=a⋅(b×c) equals the volume of the parallelepiped spanned by \mathbf{a}$$\mathbf{b} And c.
If the four points are coplanar, the three vectors \overrightarrow{OA}$$\overrightarrow{OB}$$\overrightarrow{OC} all lie in the same plane, meaning the parallelepiped they span has zero volume (it is flat). Therefore [OA,OB,OC]=0.
Conversely, if the scalar triple product is zero, then a⋅(b×c)=0Which means a is perpendicular to b×c. Since b×c is perpendicular to the plane containing b and cIt follows that a lies in the same plane as b and c. Hence the four points are coplanar.
Confusing scalar product with vector product: Scalar product (dot product) gives a scalar. Vector product (cross product) gives a vector. They measure different things.
Forgetting that vectors must have the same dimension to add: You can’t add a 2D vector to a 3D vector directly. Ensure all vectors in an operation have the same number of components.
Mixing up direction cosines with components: Direction cosines are cosines of the angles between the vector and each axis. Components are the actual values along each axis. They’re related but not the same.